Take Legal Guidance from Business Law and Commercial Law Firms in Florida

 


Business and commercial law firms in Florida are two areas of legal practice have so many covering issues that most lawyers who practice one will likewise have the ability in the other. Commercial law centers around the deal and dispersion of products. They center around supporting specific exchanges. Business law centers around different businesses including framing an organization, consolidations. And acquisitions, investor privileges, and property issues, for example, renting office or stockroom space. Business selling items will require a lawyer with experience in these fields.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Georgia Law and New York law on material misrepresentations

Image
  JCC Med., P.C. v Infinity Group , 2016 NY Slip Op 26439 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) (1) It is uncontroverted that defendant had issued a Georgia automobile  insurance policy to the brother of plaintiff’s assignor, “effective from August 28, 2010 through August 28, 2011,” who had made various representations to defendant in his insurance application, including that he resided in Georgia, that the insured vehicle was garaged in Georgia, and that the assignor was an adult who resided in his Georgia household and also drove the insured vehicle. (2) “ Upon a review of the record, we find that defendant failed to show that there is a conflict between the laws of Georgia and New York with respect to the retroactive rescission of an automobile insurance policy which has been issued to a natural person for a private passenger vehicle, as both states prohibit the retroactive rescission of such a policy  ( see  Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313;  Matter of Government Empl...
Read more

Independent contractor defense proven

  Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v A B Med. Servs., PLLC , 2020 NY Slip Op 07280 (1st Dept. 2020) “As an initial issue, 11 NYCRR 65-3.11 (a) limits no-fault medical billing to employees of the provider that submits claims for no-fault benefits. It is submitted that Supreme Court properly granted judgment in favor of plaintiffs, because the treating providers were independent contractors, as opposed to employees. The record supports a finding that the “degree of control exercised by the purported employer” ( Bynog v Cipriani Group , 1 NY3d 193 , 198 [2003]), “not only over the results produced but also over the means used to produce the results” ( Matter of O’Brien v Spitzer , 7 NY3d 239 , 242 [2006]), was insufficient to give rise to an employer-employee relationship. “Factors relevant to assessing control include whether the worker (1) worked at his [or her] convenience, (2) was free to engage in other employment, (3) received fringe benefits, (4) was on the employer’s payroll and (5) w...
Read more

Monies paid for fraudulently procured services or supplies may be recovered under limited circumstances

  In a case with major implications, the Appellate Term for the 9th and 10th Judicial Districts reached a key compromise behind the dicta found at the Appellate Term’s holding in Fair Price v. Travelers (a precluded defense based upon fraud and unjust enrichment may be recouped in a civil action) and one of the many holdings in Cornell Medical v. Mercury (counterclaims or civil actions for paid-out monies are not permitted when the defense to the paid-out monies has been precluded). Namely, a counterclaim or civil action is permitted where the payments to the alleged fraudulent claims are made within 30-days of receipt of the bills.  To quote the court: If an insurer is precluded from asserting a defense due to its failure to pay or deny a claim within the 30-day claim determination period, it may not later seek to recover amounts it paid on the claim based on a theory of unjust enrichment ( see e.g. Cornell Med., P.C. v Mercury Cas. Co. , 24 Misc 3d 58  [App Term, 2d, 11...
Read more